What's Wrong with Chaordic/Renewal
Different Leaders have given a number of reasons they are against the recent changes in La Leche League, particularly since the association of LLLI with the Chaordic Commons. These fall roughly into the following categories:
Financial:
- Accepting funds earmarked for specific organizations
- In fact, such a donation is not made to La Leche League, but to the other organization and only funnelled through LLL
- Donations that are given with conditions such as these put LLL at the mercy both of the donor and the second organization
- Possible use of general funds for chaordic (it is unclear at this time if this is happening or not)
- Questions about fundraising for non-LLL purposes
- Objections to long-term funding of chaordic consultants
Ideological:
- Changes to principles or other basic LLL documents
- Adaptation of new principles, to be used in addition to or instead of (unclear which) basic LLL philosophy
- Many of the new prose is copied word-for-word from the chaordic organization
- Identification with organizations with principles different from LLL's original principles
- Chaordic is seen by some as being "socialist", "New Age", or "kooky" (or all of the above)
- Some Leaders who consider themselves New Age still object to its being associated with LLL
- We are being associated with other organizations that are associated with chaordic
- Allowing non-Leader chaordic consultants access to Leader-only personal information
Practical/Organizational:
- Leaders are retiring because of recent changes
- Do we know that chaordic works in the long term?
- Tearing down existing support networks without a replacement in place risks destroying the organization.
- Restructuring an organization requires first knowing what is working in addition to what is not working; this seems not to have been done
- Organizations often fail when outside consultants are given too much power
- While basic chaordic principles state that decisions should be made at the lowest level, the change to chaordic is being pushed from the top down
Gobble-dy-gook-ical:
- Misuse of terminology
- Unclear written materials
- Frequent statements such as "you had to be there to understand"
- Constantly changing expectations
- Stating different things to different audiences
- Assuming good intent only seems to have to work in one direction